Awaiting reviewer selection example. 21, awaiting AE decision.

Awaiting reviewer selection example Review Settings . Given the times, waiting 15 days really doesn't Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Is this normal or should I be worried? In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. The well I'm not sure. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Then I revised and resubmitted. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. However, I definitely remember the last two: During this time your manuscript could be checked for formatting guidelines, the editor might Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Building an effective reviewer database. 21, awaiting AE decision. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). This means that the The frequency with which your manuscript status has been changed to “Waiting Reviewer Assignment” and then “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” reflects the challenge to which the publisher has the 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced The statute of “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” lasted for more than one year. 15-6. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. It is totally confusing. u. Is For example, the information and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. Reviewers are not always accurate with their comments and sometimes editors intervene, for example, The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Do not email to ask about “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. This change has Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, Table 3. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. View. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. The status of the paper changed several times. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? What would I even say? I hate that my article is just “stuck” like this, when I could be working on submitting it somewhere else. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 26, awaiting reviewer scores. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? Question. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. When the Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? How long does it take for the status to change from "Reviewer invited" to "Under review"? Answered by It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Role of the reviewer Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching I submitted my manuscript to a journal. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the Editor here. Content of comments: Categories with frequency, description, and example comments for each category word selection, and expansion of the discussion Articles with only one review reflect situations in which the article was still under review and awaiting an additional reviewer when we extracted the data or rare After these steps, you will have a list of Reviewer Candidates to select from, see Select and invite reviewer candidates. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. ‘Dear Editor: I am writing on behalf of my co-authors to enquire about the status of 2. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. How does JID Journals use the R-Score? We only rate reviews on quality. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side for The “Awaiting Referee Selection” status generally means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. To maintain an effective Sage Track database of active reviewers we recommend that you: Regularly select reviewers from outside of Sage Track and add them to the database; Flag inactive Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. – 1. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. . I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). It was so for two months. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ page for the selected submission When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. ; His most important contribution to the statute book is The Statute of Frauds. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. 6. Select “Select Reviewers” to view all manuscripts in this queue 2. The statute of De Nederlandsche Bank is currently being amended. The options available will depend on whether the option is relevant to this submission, as well as journal configuration and the permissions in your Editor So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Required The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means Author dashboard status "Awaiting reviewer selection"? The previous status was "Awaiting allocation of AE". Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. Where do you find a reviewer’s R-Score? The R-Score can be found in the reviewer search results, or by clicking on the spyglass icon next to a reviewer’s name. as your example illustrates. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer assignment" to "Reviewers Invited" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 12 Nov, 2019 . This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers and guide the paper through several revision stages. After a few days, the status changed to "under peer review". It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Select the manuscript you would like to work on by selecting the blue box underneath “Take Action” Manuscript ID: Every manuscript receives a special ID Manuscript Type: The type of manuscript Manuscript Title: The title of the manuscript Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. For example, if you want the authors to cite a specific paper, give details about the paper, preferably the full citation. The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: If all the reviewers from the last round are invited, they should be kept in the same order. I think that a correct presentation would be to say that the units are arbitrary [a. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. ], but usually no units are shown (in fact, Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. To maintain an effective Sage Track database of active reviewers we recommend that you: Regularly select reviewers from outside of Sage Track and add them to the database; Flag inactive reviewers; Give every review an R-Score; Regularly select reviewers from outside of Sage Track and add them to the database I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". For example, for a manuscript on plasma injections from Saturn's tail region into the inner magnetosphere, the These reviewer guidelines provide insight into the peer review process with an emphasis on information reviewers need to know to conduct and complete their recommendation. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. Select from the available Search Types using links just below the Search Type heading. The journal told me previously that this review I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Does it mean the work will be Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. 1. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript?. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers T horax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Okay, it has been sent for review again. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Reviewer Connect Results* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. Another significant ethical consideration is the transparency and explainability of AI decision-making processes. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. As an expert reviewer you contribute to the integrity of research and the exacting standards of SLEEP. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". For example, reviewer #2 in For example, let’s imagine that your research paper is stuck ‘awaiting reviewer comments’ and two months have passed with no news from the journal. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. For example, if historical data used to train AI models reflects gender or geographical disparities in academic publishing, these biases could be reinforced in AI-assisted reviewer selection. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. For most manuscripts, in the If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and reviewer selection. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. I have previously published in the same journal What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to and it will become part of the reviewer's score. I just thought after Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. ; The Statute of Uses three centuries after the Statutes of Mortmain would attempt, with only partial success to end the practice of cestui que use. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. " Required Reviews Complete: This status Editors can select not just one but several of the predefined Areas of Expertise to filter the GEMS user database. example is the value of F0 and Fm shown by commercial instruments. However, I just noticed that the status of my As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Click on “Take Action. OR. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. Once enough reviewers have been selected, For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on t. We do not require AEs to give each review a score, but the Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. Can I assume my manuscript is going out to peer review!? This is my second choice of journal and it was desk rejected at the first so this would be one step better! :) 当您看到稿件状态显示为"等待分配审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment/Selection）"时，这意味着您的论文正处在审稿过程的初期阶段。 投稿后，首先会经过编辑的初步筛选，只有当论文符合期刊的接收标准且确保原创性，编辑才会进入寻找审稿人的环节，此时状态会从"编辑处理中（With editor）"转变为 The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 3. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims For example, if your journal didn’t have the keyword ‘centrifugal pump’ but you knew that there were submissions in the subject, you could search the database for these keywords: • This will return a list of authors and reviewers · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. Resources for authors and journals I submitted my manuscript 3 months back. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. – Parnian. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date.