Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection. This change has occurred .

Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision 9. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. e. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. under review可能是指编辑部的初审这一关，然后就是选择和确定审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer selection），并等待审稿人的确认（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment），最后就是审稿人的审稿了（Awaiting Reviewer Scores）。 Awaiting Reviewer selection和Awaiting Reviewer Assignment都是指正在寻找或指定 I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. 6 and began distributing the Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. This change has occurred The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet?. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. The form can also be rescinded Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Related reading: After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". When does status change from Awaiting Editor Assignment is the most common status as during this stage we are inviting editors of journals to inquire if they are willing to accept your paper. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. 21 awaiting reviewer scores 2021. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, reviewers are selected on an ad hoc basis and may have no connection with either the journal or the Society. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? Hot Network Questions A puzzle for middle school students: cuboid or slice of cake? How to differentiate coyote vs wolf tracks How to define a common time between two clocks? - clock synchronization in Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Some will forcefully invite a major revision to be submitted for review and review, and some will be directly decided by the editorial department after My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. I have previously published in the same journal AE stands for "Associate Editor. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. 11 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist b9d3. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. (ScholarOne makes regular updates to their platform, once every two or three months. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". But the editor, for some reason, e. the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Forms Tracking. Do not email to ask about After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Can someone please let me know what they actually mean? Thank you very much in advance! My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Editorial Office team and via automatic reminders. Does anyone have any idea why Hi. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. Of course they are similar for obvious reasons, but are chosen by editors, not by ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). This change has occurred Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. In case the status remains at ‘Reviewers Assigned’ for a while, that would mean the AE is having challenges finding This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. 23 Resubmitted 10. 31 awaiting eic decision 2021. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. The status of the paper changed several times. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. Due to those unanswered invites, the status says 'awaiting assignment. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Current word- and semantic-based approaches treat the reviewer assignment problem (RAP) as an information retrieval problem but do not take into account two constraints of the RAP: incompleteness of the reviewer data and A reviewer selection model must have a multi-level framework in which reviewer selection strategies and related objectives guide the second level of the reviewer performance ranking process. Role of the journal editor. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. " This status has not been changed for a month. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Several of our journals also employ a panel of reviewers who have agreed to Not necessarily. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but I am unusual as to why of status away of manuscript periodically changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. 19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. This ensures that we receive as wide a mix of views on the manuscript as possible. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. 11. Commented Oct 18, 2023 at 12:39. 当您看到稿件状态显示为"等待分配审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment/Selection）"时，这意味着您的论文正处在审稿过程的初期阶段。 投稿后，首先会经过编辑的初步筛选，只有当论文符合期刊的接收标准且确保原创性，编辑才会进入寻找审稿人的环节，此时状态会 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. 投稿状态在awaiting reviewer selection 和 awaiting reviewer assignment之间变化. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor. Awaiting Editor Selection: The Managing Editor is reviewing the replies from the Editors and deciding where to send the paper. Any thoughts? I resubmitted a major revision approximately ampere month earlier to a social science journal. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Dec 3, 2015 9:59:30 GMT -5 . Reviewer assignments (i. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. t backed up) authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. 10. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. So, ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ means the associate editor (AE) is awaiting the peer reviewer’s comments and evaluation of the paper. This change has occurred makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. V tej dobe automobil predstavoval vek skok pre Saab. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. You may learn more through this similar related query: What does the journal status "Awaiting reviewer reply" mean? AE stands for Associate Editor. من بیش از 4 ماه است که مقاله ام را به ژورنال Wind Engineering ارسال کرده ام. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. This change has occurred At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". This change has occurred As can be inferred from Fig. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? What would I even say? I hate that my article is just “stuck” like this, when I could be working on submitting it somewhere else. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Now back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" the status updates in this system couldn't be more confusing. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? peer-review; journals; paper-submission; Share. If the paper was sent back for revision, the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Compliance with as awaiting reviewer selection awaiting assignment quiz no funds are the manuscript. I am curious as toward why the status of the custom Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is 2021. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. " Related reading: Why Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) 4. . During this time your manuscript could be checked for formatting guidelines, the editor might Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. 28 in review process 2021. The label and the steps of the various "status" you read on scholarone manuscript are journal-specific. This change has occurred On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Journal Selection. " Does this If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. 1 conditionally accepted with mandatory major change (4 weeks) (Two reviewers, one of whom did not agree to accept the review, should be the reviewer of the Assigning appropriate reviewers to a manuscript from a pool of candidate reviewers is a common challenge in the academic community. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. – Jon Custer. patience is key Guest. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. This change has occurred However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Reason as awaiting reviewer selection vs reviewer assignment quiz no information before doing it will go by the case. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. 3. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Selecting reviewers from areas where duplicate names are common for papers that have authors from the same geographical location may be challenging at times, since checking for conflicts using a PubMed string for these can lead to Editor here. Follow this Question. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers and guide the I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Diterima dengan The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. 28 awaiting ae recommendation 2021. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. Improve this question. Add a Now, as you can understand, you’ll have to wait for the reviewers to actually begin reviewing your paper. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The article has already been forwarded to the Associate Editor and awaits the choice of reviewers for it. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. 9. Awaiting Reviewer Scores After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. My paper underwent a revision. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. thanks a lot. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Thank you for your question. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. دلیل آن چه چیزی میتواند باشد؟ I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. I have contacted to Editorial Office several but the result is not changed. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers The status of my submission changed from Admin: Not Assigned to EA: [name] plus Awaiting ED assignment plus Awaiting CE decision at Scholarone manuscripts. The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Answer. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting 2. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. g. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". " · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . Editorial policies or practices: If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Impetus to awaiting reviewer selection vs awaiting assignment are moderated and expert in one have been selected. 5. During the peer-review Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. تا کنون دو بار در وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Assignment قرار گرفته اما دوباره به وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Selection برگشته است. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. If the editor is still looking for suitable reviewers for your paper, then he/she intends to send your paper for peer review. Candidate reviewers may include leading researchers • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. A Hybrid Knowledge and Model System for R&D Project Selection. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". 2. However, I just noticed that the status of my The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. This can take time as we await those responses. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. 18 Submit 9. Expert Systems with Applications 23(3), 265–271 (2002) Article Google In the case of some journals, a ‘technical editor’ means a peer reviewer, as the peer reviewer has the technical expertise in the subject of the paper. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. This change has occurred The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. Does it mean the work will be rejected? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Note that it may only change after all reviewers have accepted, so it may mean they're still looking for a second or third reviewer after one or more having accepted already. ). One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission (3 answers) After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. I didnt see the "under review The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. This holds happened several times. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. 24 Awaiting A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Ditolak 2. The contributor form will be visible. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by Research into Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP) is still in its early stage but there is great world-wide interest, as the foregoing process of peer-review which is the brickwork of science authentication. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. Wait! It is not late yet. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Asked by Hend Okasha on 01 May, 2021 . 19 Awaiting AE Decision 10. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. This may, however, vary across journals. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. This change has occurred Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. 30 awaiting co-eic recommendation 2021. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your Reviewers: 30 days after the assignment; AEs: Ten weeks after the assignment; Selecting appropriate reviewers is critical to have a quality and timely review process. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. What the Best Awaiting Reviewer Selection Vs Awaiting Reviewer Assignment Pros Do (and You Should Too) Dash to the action items or search by wildcards Use wildcards to search manuscripts. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. What is awaiting AE assignment? Awaiting AE Assignment: The article was approved in the previous step and awaits the appointment of an Associate Editor (AE) by the Chief Editor. ebkw aqzn yjzv dhyoi luqvoz khusfnlv rypoo hxhoul wjmbre dzdra