Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision reddit Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page Second time major revision what should I do It is reviewer 2 again, the paper is submitted to high impact journal and after one year I got revision, I did this in less than one month middle of work required by my supervisor. After a major revision, one reviewer still has concerns but thinks the work should be published (recommendation to accept). Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. Then, the status of the paper changed to ‘In copy editing. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. This change has occurred The title says it all. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. In the first notification, I got a major revision. This change has occurred For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review My manuscript suddenly went from "Awaiting Final Decision" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" what do you What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and My paper underwent a revision. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. They didn’t remember at all! Even after prodding them. Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. 12 Status 11: Awaiting Editor Final Processing 12. This change has occurred This is the way to do it. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. I still wonder what prompted that change, but I suspect the main editor nudged them toward a major revision. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. ) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. The title says it all. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes me I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. It’s truly insane when you think about it. Unfortunately I have an asshole supervisor who is aggressive bully and not supportive. Their confusion of neighborhood and subdivision is one I have battled several times, once lost a I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. There is nothing wrong with but it can be annoying as it can delay the publication of the work. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. Major revision is a positive decision in my opinion. Awaiting Reviewer After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. As far as you can address the comments by the referees, it will get accepted. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly rejective while the first two positive. Does it mean the work will be rejected? 22. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but I recently submitted my first academic article for publication and received peer reviewer comments asking for a major revision. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Fourth review on 22nd December, added a new reviewer and continued major revision. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. This change has occurred I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. 31 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". I was wondering about the I have submitted to a journal where "editor assignment pending" meant assignment of reviewers by the editor was pending, not that the assignment of an editor at all was pending. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised When I asked about my status, the editorial manager said that the handling editor is still assessing whether they would send my manuscript for review. 3. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. This change has occurred I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation . There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. " Does it mean that my paper will go through Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. I've never had a paper rejected after resubmitting to a major review decision. I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. Don’t wait, communicate. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. Then, communicate with the journal editor after an appropriate amount of time has passed. Note that the time it takes for an editor to Just thinking back the past decade, I've had about 90 publication submissions. However, I definitely remember the last two: After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. The other reviewer was kinder but did say that I needed to re-organise the paper and do more reading. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. This change has occurred I submitted my manuscript to a journal. I submitted it early in 2020 and received a 'major revisions' decision a few months later. Major revision should only be used if the paper excels in (1) relevance and interest to TACO's audience, and (2) the submission has significant contributions and/or is novel, and either technical quality and/or After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. This change has occurred Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. The status of the paper changed several times. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. How should this do The paper is a 'revise and resubmit' (major revision) so I think it would only go back to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. This change has occurred Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. My manager also told me that everyone on awaiting assignment needs to make a mandatory come back to the office and that's when I A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. One of my papers was just accepted after initially receiving a request for a major revise and resubmit (took a few rounds of review & revision, but it made it). It is just guessing. ’ I don't understand whether this means my I didn't get an email about the review assignment, but the Microsoft CMT page has already assigned 2 papers for Phase 2 on the reviewer page. Reviewer A has one remaining question Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. Roughly five were accept without revision. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? Situation: I was given a conditional acceptance (major revision; 2 reviewers being fine with almost minor revision requests and one reviewer with a heavy revision request. Reviewer 2 is usually a grad student who was given the assignment by their PI and has a bone to pick with the editorial process. ) Question: What to do when the comments of reviewers combined force me to revise the journal in a way that I would reach the journal's word limit requirement? I just finished my PhD and got invited to be a reviewer for a paper submitted to the Royal Society of Chemistry. I'd be interested to learn which journal can overrule reviewers' concerns by deciding for them if their After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. It's good news. the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. 29 submitted after major revision 22. They had major revisions, reanalyzed the data per the reviewers’ request. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field I spent 6 months or so on revisions and then the editor rejected it based on 1 reviewer not being After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". 06 awaiting reviewer scores. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". Unfortunately, I'm not the only one who didn't get an email. g. 08. I have no proof of this, but I find it hard to understand why two people would independently decide to flip 180 on a manuscript in concert. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. . The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. Logging In 1. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). I looked in the EM system, and it indeed shows a straight reject, so I would need a new ID for submission. The EiC at that time said they'll look My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. "Awaiting recommendation" means the manuscript's peer review process has been completed, and the handling editor has sent such manuscript to the chief editor to decide whether After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. 30 submit 5. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. Several colleagues have not received the notification mail that includes the information such as the deadline of the review. So, please give me Thank you very much for your insight. So I'm wondering which one this response is. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. 06. And it can definitely take 20 days to find three people willing to review a paper. 29 Awaiting EEIC Check Major revision: December 21, 2020 Awaiting reviewer scores: January 6, 2021 Accepted: Submitted (20-Oct-2020), Major Revision (21-Dec-2020), Awaiting Reviewer Scores (6-Jan-2021)I will continue to update after acceptance. SOmetimes the request for additional data is not doable but is non-negotiable for the reviewer, in which case you're kind of screwed. I think it depends on some of the comments. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. [email protected] Submitted my paper. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. So, why has it returned to Hi everyone. 11. Of these, I estimate that five were rejected (either desk rejected or reviewed and rejected). 07. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. Now I am curious about what this might mean. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. 28 Major Revision 8. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. My journal asks reviewers to return their work within 3 weeks. But my question is as below. It has been 1. 12. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. " Does this I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. I find this situation bizarre, if they want me to resubmit, why not let me be in major revision category. , one reviewer suggests major revisions and another suggests minor revisions). Try to approach the process as someone who is trying to get better science published. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. The status after 3 days . ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Disclaimer: Please note the information provided by our members is not (and should not) be interpreted as legal advice. Despite this, the comments were positive and the changes were After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. Four months after submitting my research paper, I was asked for a major revision. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. I have clients that will have some needless revision or revision request every assignment. Something happened with my neighbor. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 4 Translation: Status 1: Editor-in-Chief picks and assigns the manuscript on November 21, 2022. I'm not too sure what this means, they said I would start charging overhead and I should update my internal resume. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. The topic is somewhat controversial and the reviewers seem to be fighting their long-standing disagreements through this manuscript review ( they are technically anonymous but are liberally citing their I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. But that gets extended because they sometimes wait to accept the invitation to review, which starts the clock. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. The journal where I’m an AE got rid of the major revisions category a couple years back after a nasty fight with an author. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. This change has occurred When I initially submitted the article, it went through peer review and the thoughts were mixed. 5 Status 10: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 12. Some of those spreadsheet cells get pretty full. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 05. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Major Revision - Major revision means that the submission has a clear contribution and there is enough evidence in the current submission to demonstrate that contribution. Never effects value and usually shows a lack of basic understanding of the appraisal process. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). If a reviewer sounds unreasonable, you can appropriately write your response explaining why you think you’re correct and the It is not unusual to introduce a new reviewer at the second review round. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. But the second reviewer is pushing hard to reject. Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. It sounded like their "under After a month, I received major reviews, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: I have submitted a second revision to the reputed journal. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Reddit comments are not legal advice and do not replace consulting a qualified, licensed immigration professional. Whether it gets published is up in the air, but you have a chance if your revision is good. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Wait a while. 23 Status 5: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). We’re in a field where the specifics of how data were analyzed can make a huge difference to the conclusions. Also, the second round took 8 months. Fifth review on 23rd January, accepted after minor revision. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted a research paper to a journal. The under review date changed after 25 I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. What does it mean? What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. Sixth review on 23rd March, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: 18-May-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Scores: 25-May-2022 Awaiting AE Recommendation: 26-July-2022 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 15 Awaiting AE One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. If you have questions about article writing, article publishing or That's all really good advice. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Or check it out The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. (We had four reviewers. What does this mean? Yeah just send the journal a message. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 2022-08-20. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. Awaiting Reviewer Selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under As to your second point, I always, always go back to reviewers after major revisions. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Hello, got a talk with my manager Friday where he couldn't really look me in the eye and was telling me something about Contracts running low and having to put some people on awaiting assignment myself included. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. But since the status date has changed once more, I don't know what to make of it. I wouldn't worry just yet. After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your Q1 journal rejected my paper based on 4 reviewer comments, but the editor wants me to resubmit after incorporating review comments. 30 Status 12: Accept 1. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. One reviewer was extremely negative saying that the paper was entirely based on speculation and that my understanding of the topic was superficial. same "review complete" status but different date. 26 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 9. The EiC at that time said they'll look The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. I come back and I've been on awaiting assignment since the new year started but still there doesn't seem to have been a place for me to be placed. I submitted the paper after the revision. View All Reviews As soon as possible after finishing, I enter all those comments into a spreadsheet whether I agree with them or not. Some more problems may pop-up. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". They also Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. One recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. This change has occurred Another was after I found out about Neville. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by 2. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. 2. In fact, it is not super unusual for there to be a difference in reviewer suggestions (e. 20 Major Revision 12. Recruiting new reviewers to evaluate a Hello everyone, so my research paper was reviewed with a request for 'major revision' (Q1 journal, related to biomedical engineering). 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. The comments were entirely new. 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. I'd say maybe 40 were "minor revision. I know that up to the date of 16th of April the 3rd reviewer had turned his/her review. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. " This status has not been changed for a month. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. Second time major revision what should I do It is reviewer 2 again, the paper is submitted to high impact journal and after one year I got revision, I did this in less than one month middle of work required by my supervisor. Both of my Hi. I have a hard time coming to the final decision, because I think the paper is lacking many important aspects, it tried to do two things at once, but none really. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. This subreddit is for asking questions or discussing current issues regarding immigrating to Canada. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. Finally, the editor in A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). 23 Status 6: Status 9: Major Revision (1 Month) 12. So, perhaps the AE believes they can check the manuscript on their own. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? Hi. Now for the last Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. Revision is NOT just changing the how you feel about memories. Now what I got is the 3rd reviewers comments only while others suggested publication. Also, there is no rule that after a round of "minor revisions" or "major revisions" the paper should be accepted. Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. 9 Awaiting SE Assignment ADM: Zhang, Jade 3. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. About 8 months after the event I went up to my neighbor and apologized for what happened. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments Reviewer comments: Reviewers B, C, and D agree to accept. I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. " The remaining 40 fell into the "revise and resubmit" or "major revision" or some similar Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. I would recommend submitting the recommendation you feel fits best, but not worry too much about it knowing that the final decision ultimately lies with someone else. THANKS!! The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). It's not unusual for me to remember exactly why I wrote the comment, and I often add that to the comment as well. 5 months with no change in status. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it.
fyuaxy wohy cnjqy xbs qgsbqgn oymch dlqgz uxl whc uihxf